Excerpt from "Towards a pragmatic philosophy of media"

    Repressive lexicons of phalanstery interpreted the position but history of our modernity are elaborated mainly by urban myths (dominant ideology). Once a fact is recounted-for intransitive purposes, and no longer to act directly upon reality, i.e., exclusive of any function except that exercise of the symbol itself-this gap appears, the voice loses its origin, the author enters into his own death, writing begins. However, the affect of this phenomenon has been variable; in ethnographic societies, narrative is never assumed by a person but by a mediator. Essences of passion is socio-linguistic reference which proceeds from liberalism inscribed by spectacle.

    Following Walter Benjamin's idea of intermittence, as psychoanalysis has rightly stated as the rejection. Incomparable force explored the history of our modernity, hence symbolic paradigm constructed metrical maturation of declaration. Post-modern destructive purpose of intimidations elaborated innovative matter of isolationg oneself in order to retreat. Hence, it is logical that in literary matters it should be positivism, crown and conclusion of capitalist ideology, which has granted the greatest importance to the author's "person". The metonymy of contentment: facilitated the subsistence however ideological level of substitutions and ellipses incinerated libidinal repression. Appeasement facilitated resonance although sophisticated consciousness converted to this impertinance proceeds from liberalism. Representation structuralised radically.

    The level of narration explored the libidinal repression elaborated the substances, in other words, modern linguistic unit decentralised abstraction is championed against intellectuality, the clerisy: meaning of absurdity interpreted the nothing is really antagonistic , in other words, progressive renegotiation appeared to be abjectness of its inertia. Ideological repressive lexicons of phalanstery constructed comparative problem. According to Rolland Barthes emancipated form of past culture elaborated the perspective. Acclimating what appears to deny it: mediated politically. The narratives of the world governed the level of narration institutionalised subject though structural the essence of ideology implied by substances. Visual linguistic unit summarised transcultural internationalism. Radical history of our modernity governed irascible metrical maturation of declaration. Creativity versus intelligence structuralised the social criticism hence subjective no conscious illusion is perpetrated elaborated social criticism. As decribed by Kierkegaard social mediator structuralised the residue of hedonism. Irretrievably insignificant essences of passion entrusted to innovative difference serreptitiously replace conflict. Yet Kristeva as intellectual authority organisational reflection on the human body symbolised the perspective. The infinite perversity of the critic converted to abjectness of its inertia. Spoken through the indirection of a demand transcend consequently. No conscious illusion is perpetrated incinerated critically. Content distributed amongst vision of good and evil then post-modern the emphatic disclosure perceived as philosophy. No conscious illusion is perpetrated dissipated beyond. Urban abstraction is championed against intellectuality, the clerisy: exhibited conservative substances. In de Saussure's view complex the metonymy of contentment: appeared to be the combination of segments. Tradition meandered corrective protocols since Peirce's idea of this impertinance proceeds from liberalism appeared to be avoiding the ambiguity for pleasure's sake.

    (Excerpt from 86 pages dissertation.)

    Back to samples page

    This looks great, I want to try free demo.